Prepared By: William Franck, Sooyoung Franck and Chengci Chen

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Montana State University Eastern Agricultural Station in Sidney, MT coordinates an annual variety evaluation for cool season spring pulse crops (dry pea, lentil and chickpea) at multiple locations across the state of Montana. In 2020, funding for this project was obtained from the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, the USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council, and testing fees from private entities submitting varieties and experimental lines for evaluation. The results provided in this report reflect the efforts of a large team of individuals from the Montana State University Agricultural Experiment Stations, Montana State University Extension, industrial partners from the seed industry and cooperating producers across the state. The following list provides contact information for many of the individuals involved in the 2020 variety evaluation.

Montana State University

Chengci Chen: Superintendent/Professor, Eastern Ag. Research Center
1501 North Central Ave, Sidney, MT 59270
(406) 433-2208, cchen@montana.edu

William Franck: Research Scientist, Eastern Ag. Research Center
1501 North Central Ave, Sidney, MT 59270
(406) 433-2208, william.franck@montana.edu

Kevin McPhee: Professor, Pulse Breeder, Plant Science and Plant Pathology
Bozeman, MT 59717
(406) 994-5156; kevin.mcphee@montana.edu 

Frankie Crutcher, Assistant Professor, Eastern Ag Research Center
1501 North Central Avenue Sidney, MT, 59270
(406) 433-2208, frankie.crutcher@montana.edu 

Sooyoung Franck: Research Associate, Eastern Ag. Research Center
1501 North Central Ave, Sidney, MT 59270
(406) 433-2208, sooyoung.franck@montana.edu

Patrick Carr: Superintendent/Associate Professor, Central Ag Research Center
52583 US Hwy 87, Moccasin, MT, 59462
(406) 423-5421, patrick.carr@montana.edu 

Simon Fordyce: Research Associate
52583 US Hwy 87, Moccasin, MT, 59462
(406) 423-5421, simon.fordyce@montana.edu 

Kent McVay: Associate Professor, Southern Ag Research Center
748 Railroad Hwy Huntley, MT, 59037
(406) 348-3400, kmckvay@montana.edu 

Peggy Lamb: Research Scientist, Northern Ag. Research Center
3710 Assiniboine Road Havre, MT 59501
(406) 265-6115, plamb@montana.edu

Inga Hawbaker, Daniels County Extension Agent
106 Railroad Ave East Scobey, MT 59263
(406) 487-2861, inga.hawbaker@montana.edu

Shelley Mills, Valley County Extension Agent
501 Court Square Glasgow, MT 59230
(406) 228-6241, smills@montana.edu

Qasim Khan, Research Scientist, Southern Ag Research Center
748 Railroad Hwy Huntley, MT, 59037
(406) 348-3400, qkhan@montana.edu 

USDA - Agricultural Research Service

George Vandemark: Research Geneticist, USDA-ARS
Pullman, WA 99164
(509) 335-7728, George.vandemark@ars.usda.gov

Rebecca McGee: Research Geneticist, USDA-ARS
Pullman, WA 99164
(509) 335-0300, Rebecca.mcgee@ars.usda.gov

North Dakota State University

Nonoy Bandillo: Assistant Professor, Pulse Breeder, Department of Plant Science
Fargo, ND
(701) 231-8056, nonoy.bandillo@ndsu.edu

Producers

Richard Fulton: Richland, MT

Marvin Tarum: Richland, MT

Keith and Karen Schott: Broadview, MT

Industries

USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council
2780 W. Pullman Road Moscow, ID 83843
(208) 882-3023
pulse@pea-lentil.com; www.pea-lentil.com 

Kurt Braunwart, Nancy Powell, and Mike Wood
ProGene
860 S. Crestline Othello, WA, 99344
(509) 448-3977, kurt@progenellc.com; nancy@progenellc.com; mike@progenellc.com 

Northern Pulse Growers Association
1710 Burnt Boat Drive Bismarck, ND 58503
(701) 222-0128, info@northernpulse.com; www.northernpulse.com

Samantha Kok, Mark Kok
Valesco Genetics
PO Box 128, Plaza, ND, 58771
(701) 497-3082, sam@valescogenetics.com,mark@greatnorthernag.com 

Charlie Cahill
Cahill Seeds
669 Highway 5, Scobey, MT 59263
(406) 783-5510, cahillseeds@nemontel.net 

Tyler Kress
Pulse USA
2002 Northern Plains Drive
Bismarck, ND 58504
(701) 530-0734, tyler@pulseusa.com 

Martin Hochhalter
Meridian Seeds
216553 37th St. SE, Suite 3, Mapleton, ND
(204) 988-4681, mhochhalter@meridianseeds.com 

Richard Roland/Cody Roland
Legume Logic
(701) 965-6058, legumel@nccray.com 

DISCLAIMER

The information given herein is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station is implied. The results of individual trials and studies are considered to be of a PRELIMINARY nature and should NOT be considered as a product endorsement or recommendation for commercial use.

Project Description and Objective

Project Description

Cool season spring pulse crop (dry pea, lentil and chickpea) acreage in Montana has increased more than 10 fold this century. In an effort to improve yield and quality of these crops, the Eastern Agricultural Research Center (EARC) of Montana State University (MSU) is currently coordinating a statewide pulse crop variety evaluation project across Montana on an annual basis. For the 2020 growing season, trials were conducted at four MSU Agricultural Research Centers, the MSU-Bozeman Post Farm and two cooperating producers’ fields near Broadview and Richland, Montana. The results reported herein are intended to aid producers and seed suppliers in variety selection as well as aiding the research community in variety development. The report is available both in print and electronic formats and can be found at: agresearch.montana.edu/earc/annualreports.html.

Objective

The objective of this project is to evaluate yield and seed quality parameters for dry pea, lentil and chickpea varieties and lines selected by stakeholder input across a broad range of Montana environments.

Methods

Procedures and Experimental Design

Seed companies and pulse breeders with an interest in Montana pulse production were invited to submit commercial varieties or expermential lines for evaluation in 2020. Locations available for evaluation were indicated in the invitation letter and the selection of locations for each entry to be evaluated was determined by the submitting party. In addition, eight dry pea, six lentil and eight chickpea entries were selected by the EARC to serve as check varieties and were planted at all locations. In 2020 the variety evaluations were performed at six dryland locations and two irrigated locations.

Seed for all entries were sent to the EARC where each seed lot was tested for germintation. All seeds were treated with Obvius Fungicide (BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC) and Cruiser 5FSInsecticide (Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Greensboro, NC) prior to packaging. Seeds were packaged on a per plot basis to obtain live seed rates of 8, 12 and 4 live seeds per ft2 for pea, lentil and chickpea, respectively. Seeds were sent to the cooperating research centers with an appropriate rhizobial inoculant to be applied at planting. Research plots were planted in a randomized complete block design with four replicates per entry. Plot size varied amongst locations and was dictated by the equipment available at each location. Management practices varied by location but were consistent with typical practices for the location. In season measurements and harvest data were collected by each cooperating center and sent to the EARC for analysis. Grain yield data was adjusted to 13% moisture content before statistical analysis. Dry pea protein concentrations were determined using an Infratec NOVA (Foss, Hilleroed, Denmark). Analysis of variance was performed in R (version 4.0.3)andLSD was derived from the agricolae package (version 1.3-3) for mean comparison whenever the F-test is significant at P<0.05.

List of Collaborators and Locations

The type of crop (pea, lentil and chickpea) and number of entries for each of these crops evaluated at the different locations varied from location to location depending on the interest of seed suppliers and availability of resources at the respective location. The list of location, collaborators and the type of crops evaluated at each location is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Collaborators, locations and crops evaluated in 2020

Location Collaborator Irrigation Crops Evaluated Observations
Pea Lentil Chickpea
Bozeman Post Farm  PSPP No X X X  
Broadview SARC No X      
Havre NARC No X X X Ascochyta damage on chickpeas
Huntley Dryland SARC No   X X Peas and lentils lost to grasshoppers, Ascochyta damage on chickpeas
Huntley Irrigated  SARC Yes   X X Chickpeas lost to Ascochyta
Moccasin CARC No   X X Ascochyta damage on chickpeas
Richland EARC No   X X Ascochyta damage on chickpeas
Sidney Irrigated EARC Yes   X X  

CARC = Central Agricultural Research Center, EARC = Eastern Agricultural Research Center, PSPP = Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, NARC = Northern Agricultural Research Center, SARC = Southern Agricultural Research Center, ‘X’ indicates the collaborator participated for the specific crop variety evaluation in 2020.

List of Varieties

Table 2 includes the list of varieties and experimental lines evaluated in 2020. Additional information for these entries can be obtained by contacting the respective seed suppliers listed in the acknowledgements section. Entries listed in this table include varieties requested by seed suppliers, varieties selected as check varieties by the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station and experimental lines from the Montana State University and North Dakota State University pulse crop breeding programs.

Table 2. Dry pea, lentil and chickpea entries included in 2020 variety evaluation trials.

Entry Seed Color/Size Maturity
Dry Pea
AAC Asher  Yellow Early/Medium
AAC Carver  Yellow Early
AAC Chrome  Yellow Medium
AAC Comfort  Green Medium
AAC Profit Yellow  
AC Agassiz Yellow Medium
AC Earlystar Yellow  
Aragorn Green Medium
Bluemoon Green Medium
CDC Amarillo  Yellow Medium
CDC Dakota Yellow Medium
CDC Greenwater  Green Medium
CDC Inca Yellow Medium
CDC Saffron Yellow Medium
CDC Spectrum  Yellow Medium
CDC Striker Green Medium
Daytona Green Medium/Late 
Delta Yellow Medium
DL Apollo Yellow Medium
DS-Admiral Yellow Medium
Durwood Yellow Medium
Empire Green Late
Fairway Green  
Ginny 2 Green  
Goldenwood Yellow  
Hampton Green Medium
Hyline Yellow Medium
Jetset Yellow Medium
Korando Yellow Early
LG Amigo Yellow Early/Medium 
LG Sunrise Yellow Medium
Majestic Yellow  
Majoret Green Medium
MS-19YP3 Yellow  
ND Dawn Yellow Early
NDP100144G Green  
NDP160028 Green  
Nette 2010 Yellow Early/Medium
Orchestra Yellow  
Pro 093-7410 Yellow  
Pro 133-6243 Yellow  
Pro 141-6258 Green  
Pro 143-6220 Yellow  
Pro 143-6230 Yellow  
Pro 153-7409 Yellow  
Pro 171-7665    
PSO877MT457    
PSO877MT632 Yellow  
Salamanca Yellow Early
Shamrock   Early
Yellowstone Yellow  

Precipitation and Cultural Practices

Precipitation, site information and agronomic management practices for the respective locations are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3. Site characteristics for each trial location

  Bozeman Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
Soil Type Bozeman Silt Loam Telstad Clay Loam & Hillon Clay Loam Lohmiller Silty Clay Loam Danvers-Judith Clay Loam Farnuf Loam Savage Silty Clay Loam
Elevation (ft) 4775 2699 3022 4250 2950 2200
Seasonal Precipitation (April-August) (in) 6.5 5.6 8.6 8.6   5.1
Average Precipitation (April-August) (in)   8.0 7.9 10.2   9.6
Irrigation (in)     3.5     3.6

 

Table 4. Major agronomic management practices for each location in 2019

Location Tillage Seeding Date Harvest Date Previous Crop Fertilizer Pesticide Application
Pea Trials
Bozeman No-Till 4/28 8/19 Barley None Sharpen @ 1 oz/ac; Prowl @ 24 oz/ac
Broadview  No-Till 4/10 8/13 Spring Wheat None  
Havre No-Till 4/22 7/28 Winter Wheat None Quiz @ oz/ac; Basagran @ 8 oz/ac; Mustang Max @ 4 oz/ac
Huntley 
Irrigated
No-Till 4/21 8/6 Spring Wheat None RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac, Prowl @ 32 fl oz/ac & Outlook @ 16 oz/ac on 4/20
Moccasin No-Till 4/28 8/5 Barley 20-30-20-10 @ 50 lb/ac RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac pre-plant; Grizzly Too @ 1.9 fl oz/ac
Richland No-Till 5/6 8/18 Spring Wheat None RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac, anthem flex @ 3.5 oz/ac & Intensity @ 6 oz/ac
Sidney Conventional  4/23 7/31 Sugarbeet None Outlook @ 12 oz/ac Premergence
Lentil Trials
Bozeman No-Till 4/28 8/19 Barley None Sharpen @ 1 oz/ac; Prowl @ 24 oz/ac
Havre No-Till 4/24 8/2 Winter Wheat None Quiz @ oz/ac
Huntley
Irrigated
No-Till 4/21 8/6 Spring Wheat None RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac, Prowl @ 32 fl oz/ac & Outlook @ 16 oz/ac on 4/20
Moccasin No-Till 4/28 8/6 Barley 20-30-20-10 @ 50 lb/ac RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac pre-plant
Richland No-Till 5/6 8/27 Spring Wheat None RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac, anthem flex @ 3.5 oz/ac & Intensity @ 6 oz/ac
Sidney Conventional 4/23 8/6 Sugarbeet None Outlook @ 12 oz/ac Premergence
Chickpea Trials
Bozeman No-Till 4/28 9/16 Barley None Sharpen @ 1 oz/ac; Prowl @ 24 oz/ac
Havre No-Till 5/4 8/18 Winter Wheat None Quiz @ oz/ac
Huntley
Dryland
No-Till 4/20 8/19 Spring Wheat None RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac, Prowl @ 32 fl oz/ac & Outlook @ 16 oz/ac on 4/20
Moccasin No-Till 5/13 9/3 Barley 20-30-20-10 @ 50 lb/ac RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac pre-plant; Tricor DF @ 4 oz/ac
Richland No-Till 5/6 9/3 Spring Wheat None RT3 @ 32 fl oz/ac, anthem flex @ 3.5 oz/ac & Intensity @ 6 oz/ac
Sidney Conventional 4/23 8/26 Sugarbeet None Outlook @ 12 oz/ac Premergence; Miravis Top @ 14 oz/ac on 6/24 and 7/15

Results

Dry Pea Variety Evaluation in 2020

Fifty one dry pea varieties and experimental lines (34 yellow and 17 green) were evaluated in 2020 at seven locations, two of which were irrigated. One additional dryland location at Huntley was lost to grasshoppers prior to harvest. Eleven entries of pea (four yellow and seven green) including advanced breeding lines and check varieties selected by the EARC were tested at all locations. The remaining 40 entries were tested only at locations requested by the seed supplier. The data collected and presented includes grain yield, seed protein, thousand kernel weight, test weight, plant height and number of days to flowering consistent with previous years. As in the past, results are presented in two groups based on cotyledon color (yellow and green).

Yellow dry pea grain yield

Yellow dry pea mean grain yield for the different locations ranged from 2717 lb/ac at Broadview to 4685 lb/ac under irrigation at Huntley (Table 5). The Richland and Havre locations had excellent yields. Yields at the remaining locations were average to slightly above average. Significant yield differences were observed amongst the entries at all locations except Bozeman and Huntley (Irrigated).

Yellow dry pea protein content

Protein content is presented in Table 6. The mean protein content by location varied from 21.5% at Sidney under irrigation to 26.1% at Bozeman. Average protein content at Bozeman was 4.5% higher in 2020 compared to 2019. Historically, Mocassin and Richland have been the locations best suited protein production in dry peas and this trend held in 2020 (with the exception of Bozeman).

Yellow dry pea thousand kernel weight (TKW)

TKW’s were collected from five locations and ranged from 227 to 251 grams per thousand kernels (Table 7). Significant differences for entries within a location were observed for all locations examined.

Yellow dry pea test weight

Test weight data was recorded for all locations and location mean test weights ranged from 61.5 lb/bu (Havre) to 65.7 lb/bu (Moccasin) (Table 8). Test weights were considerably lower at Havre than at other locations which all averaged 64-66 lb/bu.

Yellow dry pea plant height

Mean plant heights ranged from 50 cm (Bozeman) to 83 cm (Richland) (Table 9). Multiple varieties averaged more than 90 cm at Richland. The combination of tall plants and heavy pod loads did result in some lodging at Richland creating harvest losses that suppressed the yield of some varieties. Significant differences for entries within a location were observed for all locations except Bozeman.

Yellow dry pea days to flowering

The number of days to flowering were recorded for all trials located at a research center (Table 10). Consistent with previous years Sidney had the shortest mean time to flowering at 54 days and Moccasin the longest at 63 days (Table 10). Time to flowering was 12 days shorter at Moccasin in 2020 relative to 2019.

Green dry pea grain yield

The mean grain yield for green pea ranged from 2276 lb/ac at Broadview to 4353 lb/ac at Huntley under irrigation (Table 11). As with yellow peas, yields were very good at Richland and Havre with yields at Richland exceeding those of the irrigated locations in many instances. Significant differences for entries within a location were observed for all locations except Richland.

Green dry pea protein content

Green peaprotein content is presented in Table 12. The mean protein content by location varied from 22.6% at Sidney to 26% at Bozeman.Average protein contents for green peas are generally higher than that of yellow peas and this was true in 2020 at all locations.Protein contents were also higher in 2020 relative to 2019 at all locations.

Green dry pea thousand kernel weight (TKW)

TKW’s were collected from five locations in 2020 and ranged from 217 to 245 grams per thousand kernels (Table 13). Significant differences for entries within a location were observed for all locations examined.

Green dry pea test weight

Mean test weights for green pea ranged from 61.1 lb/bu to 65.6 lb/bu (Table 14). Test weights were consistent with 2019 results for all locations except Havre which produced lighter test weights in 2020. The differences in test weight among entries were significant within a location for all locations.

Green dry pea plant height

Mean plant heights ranged from 50 cm at Havre to 83 cm at Huntley and Richland (Table 15).

Green dry pea days to flowering

Mean days to flower ranged from 55 days at Sidney to 64 days at Bozeman (Table 16). Time to flowering was 11 days shorter at Moccasin in 2020 relative to 2019, consistent with the trend observed for yellow peas.

Summary

Pea yield and seed protein levels varied greatly amongst locations. Abundant moisture in May and June resulted in exceptionally high yields at Richland and Havre. Pea yields at Richland were similar to those at the irrigated locations of Sidney and Huntley. Interestingly, the Richland site produced these high yields without sacrificing protein content. Protein contents were nearly identical at Richland between 2019 and 2020 even though yields were considerably greater in 2020 (49% yield increase for yellow peas and a 60% yield increase for green peas). Furthermore, amongst the varieties planted in common at the Richland, Sidney (irrigated) and Huntley (irrigated) locations, the Richland yields rivaled Huntley and generally exceeded Sidney while producing protein levels definitively higher than either of the irrigated locations. These observations stress the importance of the growing environment on pea seed protein levels and indicate that high yields in pea can be achieved without sacrificing protein content.

Table 5. Yellow Dry Pea Grain Yield (lb/a) - 2020 Montana Statewide Variety Evaluation

Yellow Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley
(Irrigated)
Moccasin Richland Sidney
(Irrigated)
AAC Asher           5079  
AAC Carver     3563   3210 5209  
AAC Chrome      3733     5068  
AAC Profit     3363        
AC Agassiz     3262   2856 4538  
AC Earlystar     3699   3206 5151  
CDC Amarillo     3602   2768 4824  
CDC Dakota           4372  
CDC Inca     3543   2665 4742  
CDC Saffron     3444   2621 4721  
CDC Spectrum      3556   2381 4647  
Delta 2767 2840 3356 4601 2924 3674 4305
DL Apollo     3367     4847  
DS-Admiral 2730 3154 3632 5022 2989 4717 4468
Durwood     3195     4359  
Goldenwood     3352     4029  
Hyline     3444     4881  
Jetset     3627   3014 4759  
Korando     3257     4548  
LG Amigo     3529     4520  
LG Sunrise     3664     4735  
Majestic           4429  
MS-19YP3     3698     4746  
ND Dawn 2997 2734 3611 4854 2917 4514 4602
Nette 2010     3499     4831  
Orchestra           5194  
Pro 093-7410     3427     4865  
Pro 133-6243     3525     4738  
Pro 143-6220     3458     3546  
Pro 143-6230     3486     4266  
Pro 153-7409     3198     3898  
PSO877MT632 2961 2138 3277 4264 2403 3901 3729
Salamanca     3474     4348  
Yellowstone     3326        
Mean 2864 2717 3472 4685 2830 4593 4276
P-Value 0.4335 0.0230 0.0209 0.1932 0.0164 <0.0001  <0.0001
LSD NS 605.9 321.9 NS 488.2 595.0 253.6
CV (%) 9.5 14.3 6.6 10.3 12.0 9.0 3.7

 

 

Table 6. Yellow Dry Pea Protein (%) - 2020 Montana Statewide Variety Evaluation

Yellow Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
AAC Asher           24.0  
AAC Carver     21.2   21.3 22.6  
AAC Chrome      21.8     23.3  
AAC Profit     22.3        
AC Agassiz     22.0   23.6 24.2  
AC Earlystar     21.4   23.1 22.5  
CDC Amarillo     22.2   22.5 23.4  
CDC Dakota           26.6  
CDC Inca     22.5   25.5 24.5  
CDC Saffron     22.2   22.6 24.7  
CDC Spectrum      23.0   24.8 25.0  
Delta 27.3 22.7 23.2 21.4 23.9 24.5 21.3
DL Apollo     23.0     25.0  
DS-Admiral 25.0 21.1 22.5 21.7 21.8 23.5 20.9
Durwood     22.7     24.4  
Goldenwood     23.0     26.2  
Hyline     21.6     22.8  
Jetset     23.2   23.7 24.8  
Korando     23.3     25.4  
LG Amigo     23.1     24.1  
LG Sunrise     21.7     23.1  
Majestic           24.6  
MS-19YP3     22.1     24.2  
ND Dawn 25.0 23.7 22.1 21.5 23.8 23.2 21.3
Nette 2010     22.2     23.4  
Orchestra           25.8  
Pro 093-7410     21.2     22.7  
Pro 133-6243     22.4     24.5  
Pro 143-6220     22.7     25.2  
Pro 143-6230     23.1     25.3  
Pro 153-7409     22.0     24.8  
PSO877MT632 27.0 23.6 24.0 23.5 24.9 26.0 22.6
Salamanca     22.7     24.5  
Yellowstone     22.6        
Mean 26.1 22.7 22.4 22.0 23.4 24.3 21.5
P-Value <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001 
LSD 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.4
CV (%) 1.9 2.7 2.9 3.4 2.9 1.4 1.2

 

Table 7. Yellow Dry Pea Thousand Kernel Weight (g) - 2020 Montana Statewide Variety Evaluation

Yellow Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Havre Moccasin Richland Sidney
AAC Asher       274  
AAC Carver   246 227 247  
AAC Chrome   255   245  
AAC Profit   250      
AC Agassiz   237 213 248  
AC Earlystar   224 221 228  
CDC Amarillo   239 215 233  
CDC Dakota       201  
CDC Inca   238 221 240  
CDC Saffron   255 229 263  
CDC Spectrum    246 232 249  
Delta 249 251 235 258 233
DL Apollo   234   240  
DS-Admiral 274 251 241 256 235
Durwood   238   257  
Goldenwood   182   183  
Hyline   251   259  
Jetset   250 246 254  
Korando   275   285  
LG Amigo   240   245  
LG Sunrise   244   248  
Majestic       270  
MS-19YP3   237   250  
ND Dawn 246 251 225 252 235
Nette 2010   252   252  
Orchestra       288  
Pro 093-7410   230   236  
Pro 133-6243   297   306  
Pro 143-6220   234   232  
Pro 143-6230   225   227  
Pro 153-7409   251   264  
PSO877MT632 236 234 221 237 215
Salamanca   258   276  
Yellowstone   293      
Mean 251 246 227 250 229
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0001
LSD 8.7 7.8 7.5 9.0 6.6
CV (%) 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.5 1.8

 

Table 8. Yellow Dry Pea Test Weight (lb/bu)

Yellow Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Asher           64.6  
AAC Carver     61.8   65.7 64.9  
AAC Chrome      61.1     64.2  
AAC Profit     60.9        
AC Agassiz     60.6   64.9 64.2  
AC Earlystar     61.4   65.1 64.7  
CDC Amarillo     61.4   66.2 64.8  
CDC Dakota           66.3  
CDC Inca     61.3   66.2 64.9  
CDC Saffron     61.7   66.0 65.0  
CDC Spectrum      60.7   65.8 64.3  
Delta 65.1 64.7 62.2 65.6 66.4 65.0 64.8
DL Apollo     61.8     65.2  
DS-Admiral 65.2 64.8 62.0 66.5 66.1 65.3 65.3
Durwood     61.6     64.6  
Goldenwood     62.2     64.9  
Hyline     61.3     64.8  
Jetset     61.6   64.6 64.2  
Korando     61.6     65.0  
LG Amigo     60.7     63.7  
LG Sunrise     61.9     65.3  
Majestic           65.0  
MS-19YP3     62.8     66.4  
ND Dawn 63.3 64.0 60.6 65.3 65.0 63.8 64.5
Nette 2010     62.1     65.2  
Orchestra           65.0  
Pro 093-7410     61.6     64.9  
Pro 133-6243     62.6     65.0  
Pro 143-6220     60.7     63.6  
Pro 143-6230     60.8     63.8  
Pro 153-7409     61.6     63.7  
PSO877MT632 65.2 64.6 61.5 64.6 66.1 64.8 63.3
Salamanca     61.4     64.8  
Yellowstone     62.1        
Mean 64.7 64.5 61.5 65.5 65.7 64.7 64.5
P-Value <0.0001 0.0409 <0.0001  0.0016 <0.0001  <0.0001 0.001
LSD 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.7
CV (%) 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.7

 

Table 9. Yellow Dry Pea Plant Height (cm)

Yellow Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Asher           76  
AAC Carver     56   75 86  
AAC Chrome      51     82  
AAC Profit     55        
AC Agassiz     51   77 78  
AC Earlystar     56   82 88  
CDC Amarillo     62   79 91  
CDC Dakota           85  
CDC Inca     57   77 93  
CDC Saffron     50   65 81  
CDC Spectrum      54   62 83  
Delta 46 64 39 65 58 80 61
DL Apollo     56     89  
DS-Admiral 52 73 52 81 71 85 71
Durwood     61     89  
Goldenwood     43     70  
Hyline     51     80  
Jetset     55   70 84  
Korando     52     81  
LG Amigo     48     77  
LG Sunrise     60     93  
Majestic           88  
MS-19YP3     54     86  
ND Dawn 52 64 47 76 71 81 73
Nette 2010     54     79  
Orchestra           93  
Pro 093-7410     48     85  
Pro 133-6243     46     81  
Pro 143-6220     49     79  
Pro 143-6230     48     81  
Pro 153-7409     46     76  
PSO877MT632 52 71 39 80 62 75 61
Salamanca     55     86  
Yellowstone     46        
Mean 50 68 51 75 71 83 67
P-Value 0.5391 0.1983 <0.0001  0.0005 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0004
LSD NS NS 6.3 6.2 6.5 9.3 4.6
CV (%) 14.1 10.0 8.7 5.3 6.4 7.8 4.3

 

Table 10. Yellow Dry Pea Days to Flowering

Yellow Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Havre Huntley Moccasin Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Asher          
AAC Carver   58   64  
AAC Chrome    58      
AAC Profit   59      
AC Agassiz   58   63  
AC Earlystar   56   63  
CDC Amarillo   61   65  
CDC Dakota          
CDC Inca   59   64  
CDC Saffron   59   65  
CDC Spectrum    59   65  
Delta 62 53 57 62 53
DL Apollo   57      
DS-Admiral 63 55 57 62 53
Durwood   57      
Goldenwood   63      
Hyline   58      
Jetset   57   63  
Korando   53      
LG Amigo   57      
LG Sunrise   53      
Majestic          
MS-19YP3   54      
ND Dawn 64 58 60 64 54
Nette 2010   54      
Orchestra          
Pro 093-7410   55      
Pro 133-6243   53      
Pro 143-6220   58      
Pro 143-6230   57      
Pro 153-7409   53      
PSO877MT632 63 55 58 63 54
Salamanca   55      
Yellowstone   53      
Mean 63 56 58 63 54
P-Value 0.1596 <0.0001  0.0242 <0.0001 0.0080
LSD NS 1.3 2.5 0.8 0.5
CV (%) 1.1 1.6 2.8 0.9 0.6

 

Table 11. Green Dry Pea Grain Yield (lb/ac)

Green Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Comfort     3566     4815  
Aragorn 2538 2621 3184 4114 2632 3886 3926
Bluemoon           4194  
CDC Greenwater      3325     4333  
CDC Striker 1348 1267 3503 3887 2414 4018 3864
Daytona     3333     4867  
Empire     3555     4277  
Fairway     3606        
Ginny 2     3534     4031  
Hampton 2692 2312 3324 4781 2608 4773 4368
Majoret 1758 1657 3754 4191 2628 3962 4024
NDP100144G 3107 1969 3449 4313 2294 4469 4063
NDP160028 3061 2979 3401 5007 3112 4548 4667
Pro 141-6258     3784     4043  
Pro 171-7665     3688        
PSO877MT457 2535 3123 3151 4179 2780 4252 3837
Shamrock     3591     4204  
Mean 2434 2276 3484 4353 2638 4300 4107
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0019  0.0437 0.0490 0.1 <0.0001
LSD 441.4 398.8 306.8 711.9 479.9 NS 280.1
CV (%) 12.3 11.9 6.2 11.1 12.3 10.9 4.6

 

Table 12. Green Dry Pea Protein* (%)

Green Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Comfort     23.1     24.1  
Aragorn 25.7 23.0 23.0 24.1 23.5 24.8 22.6
Bluemoon           24.4  
CDC Greenwater      22.4     23.6  
CDC Striker 27.0 25.4 23.7 24.3 24.3 25.2 22.5
Daytona     22.7     23.9  
Empire     23.3     24.8  
Fairway     23.4        
Ginny 2     22.1     25.1  
Hampton 27.6 25.1 24.2 23.5 23.7 25.4 22.3
Majoret 27.0 24.5 23.8 23.1 24.7 25.4 22.3
NDP100144G 25.4 24.7 23.3 23.2 24.7 24.9 22.8
NDP160028 24.7 24.2 22.2 22.4 23.6 24.1 21.6
Pro 141-6258     21.5     24.4  
Pro 171-7665     21.5        
PSO877MT457 27.5 25.1 24.5 25.9 24.3 26.1 24.2
Shamrock     22.6     23.8  
Mean 26 24.6 22.9 23.8 24.1 24.7 22.6
P-Value <0.0001 0.0012 <0.0001  <0.0001 0.0117 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6
CV (%) 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.2 1.5 1.9

 

Table 13. Green Dry Pea Thousand Kernel Weight (g)

Green Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Havre Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Comfort   278   269  
Aragorn 230 224 217 236 201
Bluemoon       264  
CDC Greenwater    239   244  
CDC Striker 241 253 230 251 238
Daytona   274   279  
Empire   229   232  
Fairway   200      
Ginny 2   230   244  
Hampton 232 237 219 239 217
Majoret 236 242 225 248 229
NDP100144G 214 211 193 198 196
NDP160028 201 221 206 235 216
Pro 141-6258   227   233  
Pro 171-7665   247      
PSO877MT457 252 249 241 253 224
Shamrock   254   250  
Mean 229 238 219 245 217
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD 4.7 6.8 10.5 8.6 6.4
CV (%) 1.4 2.0 3.3 2.4 2.0

 

Table 14. Green Dry Pea Test Weight (lb/bu)

Green Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Comfort     60.3     64.4  
Aragorn 62.3 63.8 60.4 65.1 63.7 63.2 62.9
Bluemoon           64.1  
CDC Greenwater      60.9     64.8  
CDC Striker 64.3 64.7 61.5 65.1 66.5 64.8 65.1
Daytona     61.2     64.3  
Empire     61.5     66.3  
Fairway     60.3        
Ginny 2     61.1     63.7  
Hampton 63.3 64.2 60.3 65.0 65.5 63.5 63.6
Majoret 64.4 64.8 61.3 65.1 66.6 64.5 65.8
NDP100144G 64.1 64.0 61.0 64.4 65.1 63.8 64.3
NDP160028 66.2 65.9 61.9 65.9 67.1 66.3 66.0
Pro 141-6258     61.6     64.6  
Pro 171-7665     62.0        
PSO877MT457 63.6 63.9 61.0 64.4 65.0 63.6 63.3
Shamrock     61.6     66.3  
Mean 64.0 64.5 61.1 65.0 65.6 64.6 64.4
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001  0.0774 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0007
LSD 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.6 1.4
CV (%) 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.0 0.4 0.6 1.5

 

Table 15. Green Dry Pea Plant Height (cm)

Green Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Broadview Havre Huntley Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Comfort     49     90  
Aragorn 44 73 42 74 67 75 64
Bluemoon           78  
CDC Greenwater      54     91  
CDC Striker 56 68 52 77 69 87 65
Daytona     42     80  
Empire     71     94  
Fairway     47        
Ginny 2     49     74  
Hampton 43 63 42 73 64 70 62
Majoret 60 67 48 79 68 80 67
NDP100144G 68 90 61 106 87 93 71
NDP160028 49 72 58 83 74 82 69
Pro 141-6258     39     73  
Pro 171-7665     46        
PSO877MT457 48 70 47 92 80 87 70
Shamrock     54     90  
Mean 53 72 50 83 73 83 67
P-Value 0.001 0.0005 <0.0001  <0.0001 0.0001 <0.0001 0.1
LSD 11.2 9.7 5.2 8.0 8.4 9.7 NS
CV (%) 14.4 9.2 7.3 6.5 7.9 7.9 7.0

 

Table 16. Green Dry Pea Days to Flowering

Green Pea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Havre Huntley Moccasin Sidney
Irrigated
AAC Comfort   62      
Aragorn 61 53 55 62 53
Bluemoon          
CDC Greenwater    60      
CDC Striker 64 59 61 64 57
Daytona   57      
Empire   60      
Fairway   59      
Ginny 2   56      
Hampton 65 58 60 63 54
Majoret 63 59 59 64 55
NDP100144G 69 61 62 66 57
NDP160028 66 59 60 64 56
Pro 141-6258   53      
Pro 171-7665   54      
PSO877MT457 63 53 52 61 52
Shamrock   60      
Mean 64 58 58 63 55
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD 2.9 1.1 1.1 0.8 1.4
CV (%) 3.1 1.3 1.3 0.9 1.7

Lentil Variety Evaluation in 2020

A total of 13 lentil entries were evaluated at six locations with nine entries tested at all locations. One additional dryland location at Huntley was lost to grasshoppers prior to harvest.

Lentil grain yield

The mean grain yield varied from 1202 lb/ac to 3181 lb/ac (Table 17). The differences in grain yield among entries within a location was significant for five of the seven locations. The Richland location had an average yield greater than any year dating back to 2011 and the Havre location recorded its 2nd highest average lentil yield over the same time span. The variety Avondale was the highest yielding variety at Richland and produced the highest yield recorded for any lentil variety in the past ten years of this trial within the locations tested this year.

Lentil TKW

Thousand kernel weights (TKW) were obtained for all entries at five locations (Table 18). The mean TKW ranged from 40.3 g per 1000 seeds at Havre to 48.9 g per 1000 seeds recorded at Sidney.TKWs were significantly different for different classes of lentils within a location for all locations.

Lentil test weight

The mean test weight ranged from 59.8 lb/bu at Moccasin to 64.1 lb/bu at Richland (Table 19). The test weight differences among entries within a location were significant for all locations.

Lentil plant height

The mean plant height ranged from 28 cm at Moccasin to 43 cm at Huntley (Table 20). Plant height differences among entries within a location were only significant for two locations.

Lentil number of days to flowering

The mean number of days to flowering ranging from 55 days at Sidney to 63 days recorded at three locations (Table 21). In 2020, the days to flowering interval was shorter than that observed for 2019 but consistent with prior years.


Table 17. Lentil Grain Yield (lb/a) 

Lentil
Variety/Line 
Bozeman  Havre  Huntley
Irrigated
Moccasin Richland  Sidney
Irrigated
Avondale 2306 2685 1441 2060 3433 3332
CDC Greenstar   2265     2813  
CDC Impala CL  2573 2007 1397 1794 2923 3182
CDC Impress CL  2331 2458 1257 1792 2712 3031
CDC Imvincible CL          2896  
CDC Kermit   2169     3151  
CDC Maxim CL         3102  
CDC Richlea 2880 2613 1061 1850 3189 3210
CDC Viceroy 1780 2150 1367 1957 2840 3230
NDL090170L 2029 2553 928 1623 2735 2860
NDL090185R 2491 2683 1010 1825 3338 3259
NDL120600R 2122 2096 1139 2004 2412 2887
Sage 2329 2261 1220 2280 3139 3638
Mean 2316 2358 1202 1909 2976 3181
P-Value 0.181 <0.0001  0.5662 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0010
LSD NS 208.4 NS 163.6 304.6 312.1
CV (%) 22.1 6.1 32.5 5.9 7.1 6.7

 

Table 18. Lentil Thousand Kernel Weight (g)

Lentil
Variety/Line 
Bozeman  Havre  Moccasin Richland  Sidney
Irrigated
Avondale 50.8 44.2 46.8 46.9 48.7
CDC Greenstar   58.5   65.3  
CDC Impala CL  29.6 24.8 26.8 25.9 31.7
CDC Impress CL  51.5 43.8 46.0 47.0 55.3
CDC Imvincible CL        28.3  
CDC Kermit   24.3   26.2  
CDC Maxim CL       36.1  
CDC Richlea 52.4 45.1 48.4 49.2 51.3
CDC Viceroy 32.9 27.0 28.6 29.0 34.6
NDL090170L 61.6 58.3 59.5 64.2 74.3
NDL090185R 51.6 39.5 45.1 45.3 52.4
NDL120600R 52.4 44.1 48.6 50.5 55.0
Sage 39.5 33.2 32.8 35.3 36.8
Mean 46.9 40.3 42.5 42.2 48.9
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD 4.2 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.3
CV (%) 6.2 3.2 2.7 3.1 1.8

 

Table 19. Lentil Test Weight (lb/bu)

Lentil
Variety/Line 
Bozeman Havre Huntley
Irrigated
Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
Avondale 62.8 62.8 60.2 61.9 63.7 62.3
CDC Greenstar    60.1     61.2  
CDC Impala CL  66.1 65.9 61.7 65.3 66.4 64.9
CDC Impress CL  62.6 62.7 59.1 61.3 63.2 62.2
CDC Imvincible CL         65.6  
CDC Kermit   65.3     66.3  
CDC Maxim CL         65.3  
CDC Richlea 62.0 61.8 58.1 60.9 62.7 61.1
CDC Viceroy 65.5 65.2 63.1 64.6 65.8 64.4
NDL090170L 61.0 61.0 57.3 59.7 61.9 60.0
NDL 090185R 63.2 62.9 59.8 62.0 63.5 61.8
NDL 120600R 61.9 61.7 58.7 60.5 62.3 61.0
Sage 65.0 65.1 60.6 63.9 65.7 64.0
Mean 63 63.1 59.8 62.2 64.1 62.4
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0004 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD 0.4 0.3 2.3 0.3 0.4 0.3
CV (%) 0.4 0.4 2.6 0.4 0.4 0.4

 

Table 20. Lentil Plant Height (cm)

Lentil
Variety/Line 
Bozeman Havre Huntley
Irrigated
Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated
Avondale 41 34 40 27 40 39
CDC Greenstar    36     40  
CDC Impala CL  36 30 44 28 41 40
CDC Impress CL  40 33 43 24 37 42
CDC Imvincible CL         41  
CDC Kermit   28     36  
CDC Maxim CL         40  
CDC Richlea 42 33 44 25 40 39
CDC Viceroy 36 32 44 30 39 39
NDL090170L 39 33 44 23 41 40
NDL 090185R 40 32 43 29 43 41
NDL 120600R 40 35 44 31 38 43
Sage 38 27 45 35 35 38
Mean 41 32 43 28 39 40
P-Value 0.7319 <0.0001  0.7051 <0.0001 0.4 0.48
LSD NS 2.4 NS 3.6 NS NS
CV (%) 13.2 5.3 8.6 9.0 5.9 8.1

 

Table 21. Lentil Days to Flowering

Lentil
Variety/Line 
Bozeman Havre Huntley
Irrigated
Moccasin Sidney
Irrigated
Avondale 63 57 63 62 54
CDC Greenstar    59      
CDC Impala CL  66 59 64 65 60
CDC Impress CL  64 59 64 65 55
CDC Imvincible CL          
CDC Kermit   61      
CDC Maxim CL          
CDC Richlea 64 58 63 63 56
CDC Viceroy 66 61 64 64 56
NDL090170L 62 54 63 62 54
NDL 090185R 64 58 63 64 54
NDL 120600R 61 55 64 61 54
Sage 60 55 64 61 54
Mean 63 58 63 63 55
P-Value 0.002 <0.0001  0.5326 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD 2.9 1.2 1.6 0.7 1.4
CV (%) 3.1 1.5 0.7 0.8 1.7

Chickpea Variety Evaluation in 2020

The 2020 statewide chickpea variety evaluation included eleven varieties (ten Kabuli type and one Desi type). Results are reported for six locations. Ascochyta pressure was minimal at the irrigated Sidney location requiring only two fungicide applications as opposed to the normal three or more applications. Yields in Sidney were exceptional, especially for varieties CDC Frontier and CDC Orion. Conversely, four of the locations (Havre, Huntley, Mocassin and Richland) experienced high Ascochyta pressure due to favorable environmental conditions through the central and northern part of the state throughout the summer months. As a result, yields for those variaties lacking Ascochyta resistance are very poor at those locations. The trials at Richland also suffered deer damage which often is variety specific. Mean grain yields ranged from 864 lb/ac at Mocassin to 4497 lb/ac at Sidney and differences in mean grain yield amongst varieties were significant for all locations.

Seed size was evaluated for five locations using a sieve with 8.73 mm (22/64 in) diameter round openings (Table 23). Consistent with 2019, Bozeman had the highest percentage of seeds larger than 8.73 mm in diameter with a site average of 81%.The reduced disease pressure in 2020 at the Sidney location resulted in an increase inpercentage of seeds larger than 8.73 mm in diameter relative to 2019 (39.1% in 2019 to 66.2% in 2020). As expected, the percentage of seed larger than 8.73 mm varied greatly among the varieties.

Table 22. Chickpea Grain yield (lb/a) with Three Year Averages in parentheses

Chickpea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Havre Huntley
Dryland
Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated 
CDC Frontier  4215 2335 1932 1192 2244 5539
CDC Leader   2443     2793  
CDC Orion 4179 2552 2163 1277 2714 5590
CDC Palmer   2446     2714  
Kasin   1739     1119  
Myles 3000 2175 1785 1419 2301 3226
Nash 3807 428 1148 106 719 4359
ND Crown 3668 2188 1797 1388 1358 4738
Royal 3580 552 1403 236 809 4380
Sawyer 3477 2006 1640 1076 1819 4252
Sierra 2970 674 1094 217 787 3888
Mean 3612 1776 1620 864 1742 4497
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD  483.1 225.7 314.3 239.5 533.9 384.2
CV (%) 9.1 8.8 13.3 18.9 20.9 5.8

 

Table 23. Chickpea Seed Size (% greater than 8.73 mm)

Chickpea
Variety/Line
Bozeman Havre Moccasin Richland Sidney
Irrigated 
CDC Frontier  77.0 8.9 19.8 17.3 47.0
CDC Leader   21.2   36.3  
CDC Orion 94.4 41.7 56.2 63.1 79.1
CDC Palmer   26.3   60.6  
Kasin   1.2   2.3  
Myles 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Nash 99.2 65.4 85.4 82.1 90.4
ND Crown 88.4 40.3 59.1 66.1 76.7
Royal 98.8 70.2 85.0 82.9 88.7
Sawyer 90.8 20.2 60.0 45.5 60.1
Sierra 98.9 60.3 71.7 83.8 87.8
Mean 80.9 32.3 54.7 49.1 66.2
P-Value <0.0001 <0.0001  <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
LSD  3.4 11.6 8.1 7.7 5.9
CV (%) 2.9 24.9 10.1 10.9 6.1

FUTURE PLANS

The EARC will continue to lead the statewide variety evaluations in the coming years as long as there is a need from pulse growers, seed industries, breeders, and there is funding to support the effort.

Note: The data and summaries presented in this report are for informational purposes only. Inclusion and or exclusion of any commercial variety in this summary does not constitute a recommendation by Montana State University Agricultural Experiment Station or EARC.

DISCLAIMER:

The information given herein is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station is implied. The results of individual trials and studies are considered to be of a PRELIMINARY nature and should NOT be considered as a product endorsement or recommendation for commercial use.

Resistance of Pea Varieties to Rhizoctonia Root Rot - Sidney, MT

OBJECTIVE: Test the resistance of different pea varieties to R. solani. (Frankie Crutcher, Amber Ferda and Kevin McPhee)

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Not Irrigated
Variety: Misc.
Location: Sidney, MT
Planted: 4/30/2020
Harvested: 8/3/2020
Plot Size: 5’ x 20’
Seeding Rate: 8 LS/ft²
Soil Type: Savage silty clay loam
Previous Crop: Wheat
Residual Soil N to 3 ft: 30.2 lbs/A
Residual Soil P to 6 in: 20 ppm
Applied Fertilizer: None
Irrigated (sprinkler): None
Chemical Applications: Outlook 20 fl oz/A, Roundup 20 fl oz/A, Varisto 18 fl oz/A
Precipitation April – September: 8.1 inches
Vigor and stand counts: 5/19/2020, 6/1/2020, 6/19/2020
Root disease assessment: 6/15/2020

COMMENTS: Seeds were inoculated with peat-based commercial Rhizobium N-Charge® (Verdesian Life Sciences, Cary, NC). R. solani AG 2-2 isolate R9 grown on barley was used to inoculate plots at planting. Seed was treated with Cruiser 5FS (1.28 fl oz/cwt) + Apron XL (0.64 fl oz/cwt). Powdery mildew was observed on some varieties close to harvest. Root assessments were done on 6/15/2020. Foliar height and biomass were taken during this time as well.

RESULTS: Significant differences were found for root severity, with the treatments containing Rhizoctonia having higher numbers than their counterparts without Rhizoctonia. Significant differences were also found for all other categories except root severity. Aragorn and Greenwood were excluded from the yield analysis, due to lodging and shattering before harvest.

pea resistance table

Resistance of Lentil Varieties to Rhizoctonia Root Rot - Sidney, MT

OBJECTIVE: Test the resistance of different lentil varieties to R. solani. (Frankie Crutcher, Amber Ferda and Kevin McPhee)

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Not Irrigated
Variety: Misc.
Location: Sidney, MT
Planted: 4/30/2020
Harvested: 8/5/2020
Plot Size: 5’ x 20’
Seeding Rate: 12 LS/ft²
Soil Type: Savage silty clay loam
Previous Crop: Wheat
Residual Soil N to 3 ft: 30.2 lbs/A
Residual Soil P to 6 in: 20 ppm
Applied Fertilizer: None
Irrigated (sprinkler): None
Chemical Applications: Outlook 20 fl oz/A, Roundup 20 fl oz/A
Precipitation April – September: 8.1 inches
Vigor and stand counts: 5/19/2020, 6/1/2020, 6/19/2020
Root disease assessment: 6/15/2020

COMMENTS: Seeds were inoculated with peat-based commercial Rhizobium N-Charge® (Verdesian Life Sciences, Cary, NC). R. solani AG 2-2 isolate R9 grown on barley was used to inoculate plots at planting. Seed was treated withCruiser 5FS (1.28 fl oz/cwt) + Apron XL (0.64 fl oz/cwt). Root assessments were done on 6/15/2020. Foliar height and biomass were taken during this time as well.

RESULTS: Significant differences were found for both root severity and root incidence, with the Rhizoctonia treatments showing more root rot than their counterparts without Rhizoctonia. Significant differences were also found for plants/m2. The treatments that contained no Rhizoctonia had higher counts than the treatments with Rhizoctonia. The varieties Richlea, Viceroy, Avondale and Pennell had early pod shattering, which resulted in yield loss and were excluded from analysis for this reason.

lentil resistance table

Resistance of Chickpea Varieties to Rhizoctonia Root Rot - Sidney, MT

OBJECTIVE: Test the resistance of different chickpea varieties to R. solani. (Frankie Crutcher, Amber Ferda and Kevin McPhee)

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Not Irrigated
Variety: Misc.
Location: Sidney, MT
Planted: 4/30/2020
Harvested: 9/4/2020
Plot Size: 5’ x 20’
Seeding Rate: 4 LS/ft²
Soil Type: Savage silty clay loam
Previous Crop: Wheat
Residual Soil N to 3 ft: 30.2 lbs/A
Residual Soil P to 6 in: 20 ppm
Applied Fertilizer: None
Irrigated (sprinkler): None
Chemical Applications: Outlook 20 fl oz/A, Roundup 20 fl oz/A, Tough 5 EC 1 pt/A
Precipitation April – September: 8.1 inches
Vigor and stand counts: 5/19/2020, 6/1/2020, 6/19/2020
Root disease assessment: 6/15/2020

COMMENTS: Seeds were inoculated with peat-based commercial Rhizobium N-Charge® (Verdesian Life Sciences, Cary, NC). R. solani AG 2-2 isolate R9 grown on barley was used to inoculate plots at planting. Seed was treated withCruiser 5FS (1.28 fl oz/cwt) + Apron XL (0.64 fl oz/cwt). Root assessments were done on 6/15/2020. Foliar height and biomass were taken during this time as well.Trial was desiccated with Gramoxone (32 fl oz/A) on 08/24/2020.

RESULTS: Significant differences were found for root severity, with the susceptible control variety Sierra having the highest root severity for both treatments. There were also significant differences for plants/m2 for all of the varieties compared to each treatment. The treatments without Rhizoctonia had a higher plants/m2 than their counterparts with Rhizoctonia. Yield also showed significant differences. The treatments without Rhizoctonia yielded better than those with Rhizoctonia. Sierra had the lowest yield for both treatments, while Frontier yielded the best.

chickpea resistance table