Objective:       

To evaluate application timings and rates of Headline for the control of stripe rust in winter wheat. 

Results:          

Headline was applied to Decade winter wheat at two rates (6 and 9 fl oz/A) and two growth stages (two tiller and flag leaf), either as single or sequential applications on May 1 and May 20, respectively (Table 2). The application of Headline resulted in significant differences for percent stripe rust infection, yield, and test weight. Stripe rust infection averaged 25.2%, and ranged from 7.7% to 61.7 percent. Most treatments afforded commercially acceptable control. However, the 6 oz/A rate applied at the two tiller stage of growth produced infection levels comparable to the non-treated check.  In turn, yields were statistically equivalent between these two treatments. 

            An analysis was performed to evaluate the economic feasibility of sequential fungicide applications. The highest adjusted gross return ($497.20) was obtained with 9 oz/A applied as a single application at flag leaf (Table 3). Conversely, the least profitable fungicide treatment ($413.50) was 9 oz/A applied sequentially.   This occurred despite having the highest level of stripe rust control.  In short, there was not a direct relationship between stripe rust control and profitability. 

Further, there was not a direct relationship between yield and profitability. Although the sequential application at 6 fl oz/A afforded the highest yield at 109.9 bu/A, the adjusted gross return was $495.60 per acre.  The benefit of making two applications at the 6 fl oz/A rate compared to a single application at flag leaf was $4.70. In comparison the financial loss of sequential applications at the 9 fl oz/A compared to the single application at flag leaf was $83.70/A.

Summary:       

Headline was effective at controlling stripe rust and the most economical application timing was at flag leaf at 9 fl oz/A.

 

Table 1. Materials and Methods - Effect of Fungicide on Winter Wheat   

Seeding Date: 9/29/2014 Harvest Date: 7/28/2015
Julian Date: 272 Julian Date: 209
Seeding Rate: 80 lbs/A Soil Type: Creston SiL
Previous Crop: Canola Soil Test: 29-10-158
Tillage: Conventional Fertilizer: 9-40-70, 130-0-0 TD
Irrigation: None Herbicide: Huskie 11 oz/A

 

Table 2. Effect of Headline on agronomic performance of winter wheat

  Rate HD SR LOD YLD1 PRO2 TWT1
Application Timing fl oz/A Julian % % bu/A % lb/bu
Two Tillers + Flag Leaf 9 153.0 7.7 0.0 97.9 10.2 61.6
Two Tillers + Flag Leaf 6 153.3 10.7 0.0 109.9 9.8 62.1
Flag Leaf 9 153.7 10.7 0.0 107.0 10.1 61.3
Flag Leaf 6 153.0 15.0 0.0 103.6 10.1 61.7
Two Tillers 9 153.0 24.3 0.0 96.5 9.7 60.5
Two Tillers 6 153.3 46.7 0.0 88.2 9.5 60.9
Check  152.7 61.7 2.7 78.8 9.8 59.7
Mean  153.1 25.2 0.4 97.4 9.9 61.1
CV  0.5 63.4 375.6 10.2 3.5 1.3
LSD  ns 28.5 ns 17.7 ns 1.4
Pr>F  0.7783 0.0079 0.2622 0.0269 0.2849 0.0380
HD: heading date, SR: stripe rust, LOD: lodging, YLD: yield, PRO: protein, TWT: test weight, ns: nonsignificant       
¹ adjusted to 13% moisture, ² adjusted to 12% moisture       

 

Table 3. Economic analysis for the application of Headline fungicide to winter wheat for stripe rust control      

                                         Rate  YLD Gross Return Headline Cost per Acre Application Cost per Acre Adjusted Gross Return
Application timing fl oz/A bu/A $5.00/bu $3.67/oz $5 $/Acre
Flag leaf 9 107.0 535.20 33.00 5.00 497.20
Two tillers + Flag leaf 6 109.9 549.60 44.00 10.00 495.60
Flag leaf 6 103.6 517.90 22.00 5.00 490.90
Two tillers + Flag leaf 9 96.5 482.30 33.00 5.00 444.30
Two tillers 6 88.2 441.00 22.00 5.00 414.00
Two tillers + Flag leaf 9 97.9 489.60 61.10 10.00 413.50
Check  78.8 393.90 0.00 0.00 393.90
Mean  97.4 487.07 449.91
CV  10.2 10.2 11.1
LSD  17.7 88.4 88.4
Pr>F  0.0269 0.0269 0.0942
YLD: yield