Objective:

To evaluate the effects of boron fertilizer rate and irrigation application on alfalfa yield and quality

Methods:

This study was conducted to determine how much boron fertilization is needed to achieve high alfalfa yields in northwest Montana. Similarly, alfalfa is also known for its high-water use demand. So, water regimes were added to this experiment as the main plot factor – 1) rain-fed check, 2) fully irrigated (100% evapotranspiration, ET), and 3) partial irrigation (50ET, scheduled on the same date of application as 100ET but only half of its amount). The boron rates (subplot factor) are shown in Table 1, which were randomly assigned to plots within each of the water regimes. Other management information is shown in Table 2. Irrigation applied and precipitation received in 2017 is summarized in Figure 1.

Summary:       

Boron fertilization did not impact alfalfa plant height or yield in either of the cuttings in 2017 (Table 3). However, the total yield of the season was barely influenced by B fertilization (P = 0.0583; Table 3). So, with the application of B, regardless of B rates, seemed to be nominally higher compared to the control treatment, but insignificant and is not worth the investment and time.

The first harvest was not irrigated due to the five inches rain early in the season (Figure 1). Effects of irrigation on alfalfa height and yield were significant for the third harvest and total yield of the season in 2017 (Table 4). The total seasonal yield showed increment in alfalfa yield with irrigation (Table 4). The lowest yield was for rainfed treatment (5.6 ton/A; Table 4). The deficit irrigation (50ET) and full irrigation (100ET) were not statistically significant (Table 4) which implies that irrigating alfalfa with 50% reduction of irrigation from the 100ET, produces competitive yield and water response (Figure 2) despite the risk associated with the imposed water stress.  

Neither of the forage quality parameters of alfalfa was significantly influenced by irrigation. Effect of B on forage quality was significant only for NDF and RFV (Figure 3).

 

Table 1. Total boron (B) applied per treatment and application timing

Treatment Total B (lb acre-1) Description
B0 Untreated check None
B1 0.5 Split: 0.25 lb acre-1 applied at 3-in spring growth + 0.25 lb acre-1 at 3-in regrowth after first cutting
B2 1 Split: 0.50 lb acre-1 applied at 3-in spring growth + 0.50 lb acre-1 at 3-in regrowth after first cutting
B3 2 Split: 1.0 lb acre-1 applied at 3-in spring growth + 1.0 lb acre-1 at 3-in regrowth after first cutting
B4 2 2.0 lb acre-1 applied at 3-in spring growth

 

 Table 2. Management information

Variety: HybriForce-3400 Soil Test (2016): 121-21-144
Seeding date: 05/24/2017 Fertilization (2016): 44-104-240-20S
Seeding rate: 20 lb acre-1 Boron fertilizer: Liquid 10% Agri B SolutionTM
Previous crop: Spring wheat 1st B application: 04/22/2017
Tillage: Conventional 2nd B application: 06/27/2017
Irrigation: Yes 1st harvest date: 06/15/2017
Soil type: Sandy loam  2nd harvest date: 07/21/2017
3rd harvest date: 09/09/2017

 

 Table 3. Effects of boron fertilization on alfalfa plant height and yield

  1st Harvest -June15    2nd Harvest - July 21    3rd Harvest - Sep 9    Total Yield
 Treatments HT YLD   HT YLD   HT YLD   YLD
in T/A   in T/A   in T/A   T/A
0 lb B 34.89 1.72   34.65 2.07   34.75 2.07   5.86
0.25 lb B begin + mid season 35.38 1.84   35.13 2.12   35.14 2.15   6.11
0.5 lb B begin +mid season 35.17 1.83   35.28 2.13   34.95 2.11   6.07
1lb B begin + mis season 36.08 1.87   35.73 2.12   34.07 2.14   6.12
2 lb B begin season 36.17 1.82   35.99 2.17   34.70 2.13   6.12
0.5416 0.1410   0.3236 0.4395   0.6974 0.7530   0.0583

 

 Table 4. Effects of irrigation on alfalfa plant height and yield

  1st Harvest -June15†    2nd Harvest - July 21    3rd Harvest - Sep 9    Total Yield‡
 Treatments HT YLD   HT YLD   HT YLD   YLD
in T/A   in T/A   in T/A   T/A
Rainfed 35.89 1.79   34.91 2.14   30.36b 1.67b   5.60b
Deficit irrigation (50ET) 35.55 1.83   35.60 2.14   36.39a 2.30a   6.28a
Full irrigation (100ET) 35.17 1.81   35.57 2.08   37.43a 2.39a   6.29a
PR>F(0.05)-ET  -  -   0.1090 0.3715   0.0023 0.0017   0.0123
†First cutting in 2017 was not irrigated          
‡Sum of yield from all cuttings, including the 1st cut which was not irrigated          
Different letter assignment in column are significantly different at P < 0.05          

 

 

A bar graph showing the amount of irrigation in inches on the days after regrowth of the alfalfa.

Figure 1.

Rainfall received, and amount of irrigation applied in 2017. The 100 percent evapotranspiration (100ET) was irrigated with no stress and 50ET is only half of the 100ET irrigation events. Blue arrows on the X-axis shows the cutting events. Alfalfa was not irrigated before 1st cutting.

 

Bar graph showing the relationship between the yeild, and the three different water regimes.

Figure 2.

Effects of irrigation on alfalfa total yield, and irrigation water productivity (IWP, tons/in irrigation)

 

Two bar graphs, one showing the effects of Boron on neutral detergent fiber, and the other showing the effects of Boron on the relative feed value.

Figure 3.

Effects of Boron (B) on neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and relative feed value (RFV) in 2017. Underlined B rates were re-applied after first cutting. Different letters within the graph are significantly different at P < 0.05. Data presented are averaged values across cuttings.