Principal Investigator: Gadi V.P. Reddy

Investigators: Kenedy Etone Epie, Maral Etesami, and John H. Miller

Project Personnel: Phillip Hammermeister and Alyshia Miller

Western Triangle Agricultural Research Center,

Montana State University, 9546 Old Shelby Rd.,

P.O. Box 656, Conrad, MT 59425, USA.

Background

Phosphorus (P) is one of the non-renewable essential macronutrients of plants that plays a critical role in improving wheat productivity but remains generally unavailable. Considering the important role of P in growth and yield of grain crops, identifying genetic variability for low P tolerance will be critical for increasing crop productivity. Defficiency of P retards growth, reduced numbers of tillers and reproductive structures in plants. It may be abundant in some soils but less readily available due to low solubility and mobility of its phosphate forms. In the Northern Great Plains including Montana, P availability is heavily influenced by soil pH and even when applied as inorganic fertilizer, only about 20% is used by crops and the rest is converted into insoluble forms in acid and alkaline soils (Rodriguez and Fraga, 1990). Excessive amounts of expensive artificial soluble P fertilizers are therefore used in crop production which reduce profit margins and also accumulate in water bodies, causing water pollution and eutrophication.

To look for answers to the P crisis, the development of P efficient spring wheat genotypes, which are adapted to low P soils, would be a promising solution. Wheat genotypes exhibit considerable genetic diversity in response to P and screening of spring wheat genotypes for P deficiency tolerance could help to identify contrasting genotypes for low P tolerance that can be included in spring wheat improvement programs. An understanding of the relationship of growth traits and grain yield will further help to improve productivity. More so, most research attention is focused on the responsiveness of wheat genotypes to increasing P fertilization, and information is therefore lacking on responsiveness of genotypes to low or deficient P conditions.

Objectives

The objectives of this research were to characterize genetic variability and screen for P deficiency tolerance in ninety nine spring wheat genotypes that can be adapted to Montana ecosystems.

Materials and Methods

The spring wheat genotypes classified by source were AM which included elite spring wheat lines from several regional breeding programs (Table 1), 2016 off-stations and NAM (nested association mapping) originating from 30 countries, developed by crossing landraces to a common parent (Table 2). The genotypes were obtained from the Department of Plant Science and Plant Pathology, Montana State University.

 

Table 1. Spring wheat genotypes from AM source screened for phosphorus deficiency tolerance.

TID

Source

Genotype

Origin

TID

Source

Genotype

origin

 

1

AM PANEL

KEISE

WSU

26

AM PANEL

AC CADILLAC

MANITOBA

 

2

AM PANEL

MACON

WSU

27

AM PANEL

AC SPLENDOR

MANITOBA

 

3

AM PANEL

OTIS

WSU

28

AM PANEL

SUPERB

MANITOBA

 

4

AM PANEL

SCARLET

WSU

29

AM PANEL

IDO440

UI

 

5

AM PANEL

SD4265

SD

30

AM PANEL

PEACE

MANITOBA

 

6

AM PANEL

TARA2002

SWSU

31

AM PANEL

WHITEBIRD

UI

 

7

AM PANEL

9249

CIMMYT

32

AM PANEL

AC ANDREW

SASKATCHEWAN

 

8

AM PANEL

92161

CIMMYT

33

AM PANEL

AC DOMAIN

SASKATCHEWAN

 

9

AM PANEL

BERKUT

CIMMYT

34

AM PANEL

BW947

ALBERTA

 

10

AM PANEL

9258

CIMMYT

35

AM PANEL

CULTER

ALBERTA

 

11

AM PANEL

9259

CIMMYT

36

AM PANEL

LASER

ALBERTA

 

12

AM PANEL

9260

CIMMYT

37

AM PANEL

CDC ALSASK

SASKATCHEWAN

 

13

AM PANEL

9253

CIMMYT

38

AM PANEL

CDC GO

SASKATCHEWAN

 

14

AM PANEL

TREASURE

UI

39

AM PANEL

CDC KERNEN

SASKATCHEWAN

 

15

AM PANEL

JEROME

UI

40

AM PANEL

MNO1333-A

UMN

 

16

AM PANEL

ID0702

UI

41

AM PANEL

MNO2072-7

UMN

 

17

AM PANEL

JEFFERSON

UI

42

AM PANEL

MNO2255

UMN

 

18

AM PANEL

ALTURAS

UI

43

AM PANEL

MNO7098-6

UMN

 

19

AM PANEL

LASSIK

UCD

44

AM PANEL

MNO8013-2

UMN

 

20

AM PANEL

UC1682

UCD

45

AM PANEL

MNO8106-6

UMN

 

21

AM PANEL

SUMMIT515

UCD

46

AM PANEL

SD4112

SDSU

 

22

AM PANEL

BLANCA FUERTE

UCD

47

AM PANEL

SD4165

SDSU

 

23

AM PANEL

HARVEST

MANITOBA

48

AM PANEL

SD4178

SDSU

 

24

AM PANEL

UNITY

MANITOBA

49

AM PANEL

SD4250

SDSU

 

25

AM PANEL

MN07338

MN

50

AM PANEL

BERKUT

CHECK??

 

TID=Trial ID number

 

Table 2. Spring wheat genotypes from off-station and NAM parent source screened for phosphorus deficiency tolerance.

TID

source

Genotype

Origin

TID

Source

Genotype

origin

51

2016 OFF-STATION

FORTUNA

MSU

76

NAM PARENTS

PI 8813

IRAQ

52

2016 OFF-STATION

MCNEAL

MSU

77

NAM PARENTS

PI 9791

UZBEKISTAN

53

2016 OFF-STATION

REEDER

MSU

78

NAM PARENTS

PI 43355

URUGUAY

54

2016 OFF-STATION

CHOTEAU

MSU

79

NAM PARENTS

PI 61693

MALAWI

55

2016 OFF-STATION

VUDA

MSU

80

NAM PARENTS

PI 70613

CHINA

56

2016 OFF-STATION

DUCLAIR

MSU

81

NAM PARENTS

PI 82469

KOREA, NORT

57

2016 OFF-STATION

NITT

MSU

82

NAM PARENTS

PI 94567

ISRAEL

58

2016 OFF-STATION

CORBIN

WB

83

NAM PARENTS

PI 153785

BRAZIL

59

2016 OFF-STATION

ONEAL

WB

84

NAM PARENTS

PI 166333

TURKEY

60

2016 OFF-STATION

WB9879CLP

MSU/WB

85

NAM PARENTS

PI 185715

PORTUGAL

61

2016 OFF-STATION

WB GUNNISON

WB

86

NAM PARENTS

PI 192001

ANGOLA

62

2016 OFF-STATION

BRENNAN

SYNGENTA

87

NAM PARENTS

PI 192147

ETHIOPIA

63

2016 OFF-STATION

SY TYRA

SYNGENTA

88

NAM PARENTS

PI 192569

SWEDEN

64

2016 OFF-STATION

SY SOREN

SYNGENTA

89

NAM PARENTS

PI 210945

CYPRUS

65

2016 OFF-STATION

EGAN

MSU

90

NAM PARENTS

PI 220431

EGYPT

66

2016 OFF-STATION

 

MSU

91

NAM PARENTS

PI 262611

TURKMENIST

67

2016 OFF-STATION

GLENN/MT0747

MSU

92

NAM PARENTS

PI 278297

GREECE

68

2016 OFF-STATION

 

MSU

93

NAM PARENTS

PI 283147

JORDAN

69

NAM PARENTS

 

 

94

NAM PARENTS

PI 366716

AFGHANISTAN

70

NAM PARENTS

 

 

94

NAM PARENTS

PI 382150

JAPAN

71

NAM PARENTS

CLTR 4175

PHILIPPINES

96

NAM PARENTS

PI 470817

Algeria

72

NAM PARENTS

CLTR 7635

RUSSIAN FED

97

NAM PARENTS

PI 477870

Peru

73

NAM PARENTS

CLTR 11223

CROATIA

98

NAM PARENTS

PI 565213

BOLIVIA

74

NAM PARENTS

CLTR 15134

PAKISTAN

99

NAM PARENTS

PI 572692

GEORGIA

75

NAM PARENTS

CLTR 15144

SAUDI ARABIA

 

 

 

 

TID=Trial ID number

 

This research was conducted in a high tunnel facility (greenhouse) of the Western Triangle Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Conrad, MT. Plants were grown in cylindrical plastic pots in potting mix of peat, vermiculite and sand in the ratio of 1:1:1. During mixing, sufficient P treatment received 25 ppm of MAP and low P with a residual P of 5 ppm received no P fertilizer. Therefore, the two levels of P maintained in the trial were 5 ppm P (designated as P5) and 30 ppm P (designated as P30). Other required nutrients were sufficiently supplied. All nutrients were mixed thoroughly with growing media before potting with 10 kg of the mixture per pot. The treatments were performed in triplicate and arranged in a completely randomized design. Twelve seeds of each genotype were sown at 4-cm depth in each pot in April 2017. Plants were irrigated every other day to maintain a soil moisture level per pot of 60% of the field capacity during growth of the plants by weighing and adding water to make up loses.

 

After emergence, plants were thinned to eight plants per pot at the 2-leaf stage. The greenhouse was monitored daily by a temperature recording device, Onset Hobo Data Loggers, (Onset Computer Corporation, MA). Mean temperatures ranged from 10°C at night to 25°C during the day. Plants were harvested at 106 DAS. Height, tiller number, and head number of all 99 varieties were recorded shortly before harvest. Plant height was determined as the distance between potting mix surface level and the tip of the last head. Harvested shoots in each pot were collected and oven dried at 70 °C until a constant dry weight (g/pot). Grain yield and 1000 seed weights were determined. Grains from a subset of 20 genotypes selected based on grain yield after ranking the yields of P5 plants from highest to lowest were selected, milled and the ground samples were sent to Agvise Laboratory to analyze for grain P and N concentrations. Grain protein content was determined, and grain P uptake (mg/pot) was calculated.

Results

Table 3. Grain yields and protein content of 20 genotypes selected based on grain yield after ranking the yields of low P plants from highest to lowest. Values are means ± standard deviations.

 

TID

 

Genotype

Grain yield (g pot-1)

 

Grain protein content

 

Highest 20

 

 

   P5    

 

P30   

 

P5     

 

P30  

24

UNITY

13.9±1.8

15.4±2.3

14.6±0.3

15.3±0.7

30

PEACE

13.6±4.4

12.8±3.0

14.7±1.0

16.7±0.4

55

VIDA

13.6±3.7

17.6±3.2

14.6±0.3

15.2±0.8

53

REEDER

13.0±1.2

17.8±1.3

14.2±0.5

15.0±0.5

74

CLTR 15134

12.2±0.7

12.6±0.8

13.4±0.4

17.1±1.0

59

ONEAL

12.1±0.7

16.9±2.0

14.2±0.3

15.5±0.5

51

FORTUNA

12.0±2.6

15.4±5.5

14.1±0.5

14.7±1.0

48

SD4178

12.0±3.7

14.3±4.3

14.2±0.6

15.2±0.6

31

WHITEBIRD

11.9±2.3

18.3±7.0

13.3±0.6

13.9±1.0

23

HARVEST

11.8±0.4

16.0±2.1

13.6±0.2

16.2±0.6

17

JEFFERSON

11.7±2.3

19.5±6.0

13.2±0.3

14.6±0.8

34

BW947

11.7±4.1

16.1±5.1

14.6±0.4

16.1±0.7

99

PI572692

11.7±1.4

12.8±1.3

13.0±0.8

16.4±2.0

57

NITT

11.6±2.4

18.8±3.8

14.7±0.4

15.4±0.8

64

SY SOREN

11.4±1.3

8.3±2.9

14.2±0.4

16.4±0.3

90

PI220431

11.4±3.1

13.9±4.4

12.7±0.9

13.9±1.3

77

PI9791

11.4±3.6

15.5±1.0

14.3±0.3

16.0±0.8

88

PI192569

11.3±3.3

16.4±5.2

13.9±0.5

14.1±0.9

39

CDC KERNEN

11.2±1.7

19.3±1.5

14.2±1.0

14.3±0.2

6

TARA 2002

11.2±2.9

12.5±4.9

13.7±1.0

15.6±1.2

Mean

 

12.1

15.5

14.1

15.4

TID Trial ID number.

Significance of results and recommendations

This study confirms the possibility of departing from rectifying P deficiencies in soils by commercial chemical fertilizers. It highlights an approach whereby the inherent genetic differences with respect to P deficiency tolerance can be exploited to partially, at least, tackle the intractable problem of P deficiency as a factor in crop production. In this study, Unity, Peace, Vida, Reeder and CLTR 15134 spring wheat genotypes showed substantial tolerance in their growth response, grain yield and protein content under a P-deficient conditions. The genetic variability identified in this research for grain yields offers useful information for spring wheat improvement programs for choosing genotypes with low P tolerance characteristics. These results could also be used to select interesting genotypes for organic spring wheat production in Montana.

This study should be repeated in the greenhouse only for the selected genotypes and field evaluations are recommended to confirm their P tolerance abilities. Detailed findings of this research project is being prepared into a manuscript for possible submission to an international peer reviewed journal.

Project Challenges

This project was well implemented except that the top of the hoop house (greenhouse) was ripped apart by strong winds in the middle of the trial. Minimal bird and rodent damage was also recorded.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Montana Wheat and Barley Committee. The support of the MSU- Western Triangle Agricultural Research Center staff was highly appreciated.

References

Rodriguez, D. and Fraga, R. 1999. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv. 17: 319339.