Cold Hardy Wine and Table Grapes
Research Importance
MSU WARC is conducting research in cold-hardy grapes that are adapted to favorable sites in Montana to support the growing vineyard and winery industry in the state. There are currently 53 vineyards planted in Montana, with over 25,000 vines. WARC, in partnership with the Montana Wine and Grape Association, is studying pruning, control of canopy vigor, vine nutrition and irrigation practices in vineyards throughout the state, to help growers determine how these practices affect fruit chemistries (sugars and acids) for the optimal fruit quality and wine flavor.
The cold-hardy wine grape varieties that are grown in Montana and other USDA plant
hardiness zone 4-6 areas are French-American hybrid grapevines, created by crossing
French wine grapes (Vitis vinifera) that are only hardy to -5⁰ F with American native grapes, most commonly Vitis aestivalis (the Summer grape); Vitis riparia (the Riverbank grape), and Vitis rupestris, (the Sand grape). Breeding programs continue to improve hybrid grapevines, with
active programs at Cornell University, the University of Minnesota and North Dakota
State University that have created thousands of new varieties. In addition to cold
tolerance, French-American hybrids are more resistant to common vineyard diseases
like downy and powdery mildew, nematodes and phylloxera. French-American hybrids can
produce quality wines when there’s sufficient heat during the growing season to ripen
the grapes (~2000 growing degree days base 50⁰ F). Site selection is critical to ensure
good ripening conditions and the most favorable areas in Montana include the Yellowstone
River and Clark Fork of the Yellowstone valleys and warmer sites west of the continental
divide.
Jump to:
- Program Overview (video)
- Research Summary
- Results
- Conclusions
- Guide to Growing Grapes in Montana
- Bird Management in Fruit (video)
- Additional Grower Resources
Program Overview
Research Summary
MSU WARC current research vineyard was planted in 2014, with an additional planting
in 2016. The varietals chosen at WARC are Marquette, Frontenac, Petite Pearl, Frontenac
Gris, LaCrescent, and St.Pepin as wine grapes, with Somerset Seedless and Bluebell
for table grapes. The 2016 planting included Crimson Pearl, Verona, Baltica, and three
yet unnamed Tom Plocher varietals, TP B-3-40, TP 1-1-12 and TP 2-3-51 (http://www.petitepearlplus.com/). These vines are studied for their cold hardiness and winter survival rates, as
well as their phenology, to monitor bud burst, fruit set, and harvest in this area
of the state.
Results
The most popular red wine varieties currently planted in Montana include Marquette, Petite Pearl, Marechal Foch, and Frontenac, while the most widely planted white variety is St. Pepin, followed by Prairie Star. Some of the many other cold hardy varietals include Frontenac Gris, Crimson Pearl, St.Croix, Verona, LaCrescent, Leon Millot, Louise Swenson, Itasca, and Sabrevois. In our research vineyard, all varieties planted in 2014 have grown well. Among the red wine varieties, Frontenac has larger clusters (Table 1) and is very vigorous and productive (Table 2). Marquette has experienced higher mortality (Table 2, as seen in other vineyards in the state), but produces quality juice. Petite Pearl has lower sugar content and lower total acidity (TA, Table 2).
Our results also emphasize the balance between production and quality in grapes. In 2018, an average of 128 clusters per vine were left to ripen (more than twice the number compared to the year before). The increase in production was associated with a large increase in total acidity (Tables 2 and 3).
Type
|
Variety
|
Cluster Wt (g)
|
Berry Wt (g)
|
---|---|---|---|
Red |
Frontenac
|
70.8 |
0.9 |
Marquette
|
44.6
|
0.9
|
|
Petite Pearl
|
44.7
|
0.9
|
|
Table |
Bluebell
|
64.4
|
2.5
|
Table/White
|
Somerset Seedless
|
25
|
0.9
|
White |
Frontenac Gris
|
73.3
|
0.9
|
LaCrescent
|
52.9
|
1
|
|
St. Pepin
|
66.3
|
1.8
|
Variety
|
Year
|
% Fruiting
|
Harvest Date
|
Clusters per vine
|
Yield (lbs/plant)
|
Yield (lbs/acre)
|
Brix
|
pH
|
TA
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frontenac
|
2016
|
83 |
9/27 |
5
|
0.4
|
285
|
30.7
|
3.0
|
2.4
|
2017
|
100 |
9/21 |
50
|
9.2
|
5995
|
23.8
|
3.0
|
1.9
|
|
2018
|
100
|
10/3
|
149
|
19.3
|
12645
|
18.0
|
2.9
|
3.6
|
|
Marquette
|
2016
|
50
|
9/27
|
7
|
0.4
|
287
|
29.0
|
3.1
|
1.8
|
2017
|
67
|
9/21
|
63
|
6.3
|
4157
|
23.7
|
3.0
|
1.7
|
|
2018
|
67
|
10/3
|
126
|
12.1
|
7939
|
22.5
|
3.0
|
2.6
|
|
Petite Pearl
|
2016
|
92
|
9/27
|
7
|
0.6
|
384
|
21.9
|
3.1
|
1.3
|
2017
|
92
|
9/29
|
72
|
7.6
|
4961
|
19.1
|
3.1
|
1.0
|
|
2018
|
92
|
10/3
|
123
|
11.2
|
7368
|
17.0
|
3.0
|
2.4
|
All white wine varieties have been hardy and productive (Table 3). La Crescent and St. Pepin have had lower total acidity than Frontenac Gris when production is lower than 10 lbs/vine.
Variety
|
Year
|
% Fruiting
|
Harvest Date
|
Clusters per Vine
|
Yield (lbs/plant)
|
Yield (lbs/acre)
|
Brix
|
pH
|
TA
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frontenac Gris |
2016
|
67 |
9/27 |
3
|
0.3
|
185
|
29.9
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
2017
|
75
|
9/21
|
41
|
7.3
|
4784
|
25.5
|
3.0
|
2.0
|
|
2018
|
83
|
10/3
|
124
|
17.8
|
11658
|
18.4
|
3.0
|
3.2
|
|
La Crescent
|
2016
|
75
|
9/27
|
5
|
0.4
|
291
|
25.4
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
2017
|
100
|
9/29
|
63
|
9.0
|
5867
|
24.4
|
3.0
|
1.8
|
|
2018
|
100
|
10/3
|
143
|
13.0
|
8530
|
21.7
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
|
St. Pepin
|
2016
|
58
|
9/27
|
2
|
0.2
|
101
|
23.7
|
3.1
|
1.2
|
2017
|
83
|
9/29
|
51
|
7.3
|
4812
|
21.3
|
3.1
|
1.2
|
|
2018
|
83
|
10/3
|
103
|
15.2
|
9981
|
18.1
|
3.1
|
2.4
|
Both table grape varieties have grown well, although Bluebell experienced higher mortality rates in the first few years. Both are productive and have excellent flavor. Bluebell has large purple grapes (Table 1) with a Concord grape flavor. Somerset seedless has small, peach colored grapes with a flavor reminiscent of peach and raspberry that ripen 3 to 4 weeks before Bluebell (Table 4).
Variety
|
Year
|
% Fruiting
|
Harvest Date
|
Clusters per Vine
|
Yield (lbs/plant)
|
Yield (lbs/acre)
|
Brix
|
pH
|
TA
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluebell |
2016
|
50 |
9/19 |
2
|
0.2
|
142
|
22.1
|
ND
|
ND
|
2017
|
50
|
9/21
|
44
|
6.7
|
4381
|
21.3
|
3.1
|
0.9
|
|
2018
|
86
|
10/3
|
76
|
10
|
6531
|
16.7
|
3.1
|
2.3
|
|
Somerset Seedless
|
2016
|
50
|
9/19
|
4
|
0.2
|
139
|
25.6
|
ND
|
ND
|
2017
|
100
|
9/6
|
42
|
4.0
|
2651
|
23.3
|
3.2
|
1.0
|
|
2018
|
100
|
9/9
|
161
|
9.0
|
5870
|
22.9
|
3.4
|
1.5
|
Conclusions
Quality table and wine grapes can be grown in warmer sites in Montana. MSU-WARC will continue to work with growers and winemakers to exploit the agro-tourism opportunities in the state.
Additional Grower Resources
Northern Grapes project: a collaboration of multiple universities to support grape growing and wine making in colder regions of the U.S.
Montana Grape and Winery Association
University of Minnesota Grape Program
An Iowa State University review of cold climate grape cultivars.
Minnesota Grape Growers Association-information on hardy wine and table grapes.